One-Pager

End of Life, Brain Death and Organ Donation

Family meetings, surrogates, code status, comfort-focused withdrawal, 2023 brain death criteria and donation

Reviewed by Alex G, BSN, RN, CEN, CCRN, CMC, NREMT-P · Checked against current sources October 2026

Download one-page PDFLetter landscape, ready to print or keep with your notes

Family meetings and goals of care

Meet early and often. Huddle first: prognosis, recommendation; private room, interpreter, bedside nurse.

Lautrette 2007: a VALUE conference plus a bereavement brochure cut family PTSD symptoms at 90 days (45% vs 69%).
VALUEIn the meeting
VValue what the family says
AAcknowledge emotions; allow silence
LListen more than you talk
UUnderstand the patient as a person
EElicit questions

Surrogates, code status, palliative care

Surrogates use substituted judgment (what the patient would choose), else best interests. A named agent comes first, then the state's default order.

TermMeaning
DNR (DNAR)No CPR; other treatment continues unless limited
DNINo intubation; other treatment continues
Comfort-focusedTreat symptoms; stop what only prolongs dying
Advance directivePatient's legal document: living will, named agent
POLSTClinician-signed portable orders; seriously ill or frail

Palliative care triggers (Norton 2007): ICU after ≥10 hospital days, age >80 with ≥2 life-threatening comorbidities, stage IV cancer, post-arrest, ICH on a ventilator.

Withdrawing life support

  1. Decision and comfort orders confirmed; OPO already called
  2. Family prepared for breathing changes; often minutes to hours
  3. Stop labs, alarms, pressors, dialysis, feeds; ICD shocks off
  4. Opioid bolus before extubation; more boluses as needed
Truog 2008. Opioids for dyspnea and pain, benzodiazepines for anxiety; no ceiling; bolus with every rate increase.
DrugTypical adult IV doseInfusion
Morphine2–10 mg0.05–0.5 mg/kg/h
Fentanyl0.5–2 mcg/kg0.5–10 mcg/kg/h
Midazolam0.02–0.1 mg/kg1–5 mg/h
Lorazepam1–3 mg0.5–4 mg/h

Extubation, terminal wean, double effect

ARREVE 2017: family PTSD at 3 months and time to death equal; decide with team and family.
ApproachForAgainst
Terminal extubationNo tube; less nursing-assistant strainMore airway obstruction and gasping
Terminal weanTime to titrate drugs to dyspneaTube stays; may prolong dying

Double effect: dosing to relieve suffering is ethical even if death comes sooner, because that is foreseen, not intended; chart symptom, dose, response. Titrated doses did not shorten dying (Chan 2004).

The nurse's role

Brain death (2023 AAN/AAP/CNS/SCCM)

Adults: one exam; children: two, 12 h apart. EEG and CTA do not count. Death time: final apnea-test ABG.
StepAdult criteria
PrerequisitesKnown irreversible cause; ≥24 h after anoxic injury
Temp, BPCore ≥36 °C; SBP ≥100 and MAP ≥75 (MAP alone on VA-ECMO)
Confounders≥5 drug half-lives; train-of-four 4/4; no severe metabolic upset
ExamComa; no pupil, corneal, oculocephalic, caloric, gag, cough reflex
Apnea test100% O₂ ≥10 min; start PaCO₂ 35–45; no ventilator breaths
PositiveNo breaths; PaCO₂ ≥60 and ≥20 above baseline; pH <7.30
AbortSBP <100 or MAP <75; progressive SpO₂ fall below 85%; unstable rhythm
AncillaryIf exam or apnea test incomplete: angiography, radionuclide flow, TCD

Organ donation

CMS: refer every death and imminent death to the OPO, ideally within 1 hour and before withdrawal. Triggers (agreed with the OPO): ventilated brain injury with GCS often ≤5, brain death testing, plan to withdraw.

Gries 2013: transplant staff take no part in withdrawal or declaring death. CMS: only the OPO or a trained requester asks the family.
FeatureBrain death (DBD)Circulatory death (DCD)
PatientDead by neurologic criteriaNot brain dead; withdrawal already chosen
Death declaredCare team's brain death examOwn team, ≥2 min pulseless; OPTN: recovery ≥5 min
If no death—Comfort care continues
Practice End of Life, Brain Death and Organ Donation questions free in your browser70 exam-style questions with rationales. No account or download needed.

In depth

The one-page summary above is what the PDF prints. These sections go further.

Family outcomes and the communication evidence

At 90 days, 33.1% of 284 relatives had post-traumatic stress symptoms, more often after sharing end-of-life decisions (Azoulay 2005). In 51 audiotaped conferences, clinicians did 71% of the talking; families who spoke more were more satisfied (McDonagh 2004).

Lautrette 2007 randomized relatives of dying ICU patients to a proactive VALUE conference plus a bereavement brochure, or the customary conference: at 90 days the intervention group had fewer PTSD-related symptoms (45% vs 69%), anxiety (45% vs 67%) and depression (29% vs 56%). In PARTNER (White 2018; 1,420 patients), family support from the ICU team left 6-month anxiety, depression and PTSD scores unchanged but improved rated communication (69.1 vs 62.7) and shortened ICU stay (6.7 vs 7.4 days).

A condolence letter raised PTSD-related symptoms at 6 months, 52.4% vs 37.1% (Kentish-Barnes 2017).
StatementSource and strength
Structured tools for shared decision-makingSCCM 2025: conditional, moderate
Standard process to identify the legal surrogateSCCM 2025: good practice
Proactive palliative care or ethics consultationSCCM 2025: conditional, low
Written information leaflets in every ICUESICM 2024: high-level evidence
Bereavement leaflet plus a conference before deathESICM 2024: high-level evidence
No routine condolence lettersESICM 2024: low-level evidence

Running a goals-of-care meeting

  1. Prepare: agree the facts, likely outcomes and a recommendation; pick one lead speaker; invite the bedside nurse; book a professional interpreter, not a relative.
  2. Open: introductions, purpose, what the family already understands.
  3. Inform: one headline in plain words, then stop; say died and dying (Truog 2008).
  4. Respond to emotion before adding facts; allow silence.
  5. Explore what mattered to the patient and what they would say now.
  6. Recommend a plan that fits those values: what continues, what stops, and that the patient will not be abandoned or left to suffer (Truog 2008).
  7. Close: summarize, set the next contact, document the decision, surrogate and code status.

Shared decision-making is the default for value-laden ICU decisions, but families differ in how much of the decision they want to carry; the ACCM/ATS statement (Kon 2016) asks clinicians to adapt, generally offering a recommendation and, if a family prefers, leading the decision while it stays free to disagree. Hoping for the best while planning for the worst keeps hope without leaving families unprepared (Truog 2008).

A time-limited trial uses agreed treatments for a set period, with markers of improvement or decline chosen in advance and a meeting to review them. After physicians in three public-hospital ICUs were trained to offer them to patients with advanced illness (Chang 2021; 209 patients), family meetings rose from 60% to 96% and moved from about day 5.5 to day 1, median ICU stay fell from 8.7 to 7.4 days, ventilation (85.8% vs 72.9%) and central lines (71.7% vs 40.0%) fell, and hospital mortality was unchanged (58.4% vs 58.3%).

Surrogates, conflict and moral distress

A surrogate decides as the patient would have (substituted judgment), using stated wishes and values; when those are unknown, the standard is the patient's best interests. A health care agent named by the patient comes first; otherwise state law sets a default order, commonly spouse or partner, adult children, parents, then siblings. Relatives outside that order have no authority.

Three principles frame US practice (Truog 2008): withholding and withdrawing are equivalent (the ANA 2024 adds legally); allowing death from disease differs from killing, because patients and surrogates may refuse any treatment (Quinlan); and double effect separates relieving symptoms from causing death. A nurse may never act with the intent of ending a patient's life (ANA 2024).

For requests the team believes should not be met, the 2015 multisociety statement (Bosslet) keeps futile for interventions that cannot reach their physiologic goal and calls the rest potentially inappropriate. Prevent conflict with early communication; if it persists, use a fair process: expert consultation, written notice, a second opinion, committee review, an offer of transfer, notice of external appeal, then carrying out the outcome, with high-quality palliative care if treatment stops. SCCM 2025 suggests every hospital have such a policy.

Moral distress, knowing the right action but feeling unable to take it, is common among ICU nurses when treatment seems only to prolong dying. Raise it at rounds, request an ethics consultation, and debrief after deaths (Truog 2008). A nurse may decline to take part on moral grounds but must hand off care safely, never abandon the patient.

Palliative care triggers, code status and POLST

The ICU team provides primary palliative care; specialists join when needs exceed it. In Norton 2007 (191 high-risk medical ICU patients), proactive consults for the five triggers on the one-pager shortened ICU stay from 16.3 to 9.0 days without changing mortality or discharge disposition. ESICM 2024 also suggests validated symptom-assessment tools for patients with advanced illness.

National POLST comparison. Truog 2008: CPR without intubation is not consistent with good care.
Order or documentWhat it doesCommon pitfall
DNR (DNAR)Withholds CPR onlyRead as do not treat
DNIWithholds intubationPaired with full CPR, which needs an airway
Comfort-focused careSymptom relief is the goalLabs, monitors and alarms left running
Advance directiveLiving will and named agent; any adultNot an order EMS can follow
POLSTPortable orders signed by a clinicianMeant for serious illness or frailty

A DNR order says nothing about pressors, antibiotics, dialysis or ICU admission; each is decided on its merits. Turn off defibrillator shocks once comfort is the goal, and revisit code status whenever goals change.

Withdrawing life support step by step

Truog 2008 treats withdrawal as an ICU procedure with a plan, and SCCM 2025 suggests protocols that assess symptoms before, during and after extubation. Withdrawing treatment is never withdrawing care. Antibiotics, pressors, dialysis, blood, IV fluids and feeds add no comfort, and apart from the ventilator they can stop at once without distress. Explain why monitors come off, so the family watches the patient, not the screen.

  1. Before: decision documented; OPO called (CMS requires it before withdrawal); family and chaplain offered time and rituals.
  2. Before: paralytic off and worn off; ICD shocks off; labs, imaging and alarms stopped.
  3. Before: comfort orders written (opioid and benzodiazepine bolus and infusion, suction); prescriber available.
  4. During: opioid bolus first; suction, extubate or reduce support; treat distress at once; afterward, pronounce death per policy and give the family time.

Extubation or terminal wean? Truog 2008 finds no basis for a dogmatic choice: terminal weaning is not ethically required, and its only justification is time to titrate drugs to dyspnea. In ARREVE (Robert 2017; 458 patients, 43 French ICUs), immediate extubation brought more airway obstruction, gasping and higher Behavioral Pain Scale scores, but relatives' 3-month stress scores (IES-R 30.5 with extubation vs 31.9 with weaning), grief, anxiety, depression and time to death did not differ, and assistant nurses reported less job strain.

Of 822 terminally extubated patients (Fehnel 2020), 19% had a respiratory rate above 30 within 1 hour and 30% within 6 hours; no anticipatory opioid (adjusted OR 2.08), no opioid in the first hour, GCS above 8 and P/F below 200 predicted it, and anticipatory dosing did not change time to death. In Chan 2004 (75 patients), median time to death after ventilator withdrawal was 35 minutes (range 1 to 890).

Prepare the family for irregular breaths and pauses, noisy secretions, mottled skin and an unpredictable time course. Truog 2008 advises against the word agonal, which sounds like agony; with good palliation this breathing is part of dying, not suffering.

Symptom control and the ethics of comfort

Most dying ICU patients cannot report symptoms, so distress is read from behavior: tachypnea, tachycardia, a fearful face, accessory muscle use, paradoxical breathing and nasal flaring (Truog 2008), formalized in the Respiratory Distress Observation Scale; CPOT or BPS scores pain. Treat what you see, then reassess within minutes.

Opioids are the mainstay for pain and dyspnea. Truog 2008 names morphine the agent of choice, with fentanyl (by infusion, since a bolus wears off quickly) or hydromorphone as alternatives. Benzodiazepines add anxiolysis, sedation and amnesia but no analgesia; midazolam peaks in 5–10 minutes, lorazepam in 20–25. When distress recurs, bolus and raise the infusion together, since a rate change alone takes hours to reach steady state. Doses for opioid-tolerant patients scale to current use; the target is comfort, not a number.

Noisy secretions often trouble families more than the patient: turn the patient onto the side, suction the mouth gently, stop IV fluids, and consider glycopyrrolate or scopolamine, whose benefit is uncertain.

Double effect separates giving drugs to relieve suffering, with the foreseen but unintended possibility of hastening death, from giving them to cause death, a line US law also draws (Truog 2008). Because intent shows in practice, chart the sign of distress, the dose and the response, and raise doses in proportion to symptoms. Chan 2004 found no link between opioid or benzodiazepine dose and time to death after withdrawal; in the last 2 hours, each 1 mg/h more benzodiazepine was associated with 13 minutes longer survival.

Brain death: physiology and the 2023 standard

Rising ICP from a mass, hemorrhage or anoxic swelling stops cerebral blood flow and the brainstem herniates. A catecholamine surge gives way to vasoplegia; central diabetes insipidus affects 46–86% of donors; temperature control is lost (Meyfroidt 2019). The 2023 AAN/AAP/CNS/SCCM guideline (Greer), replacing those of 2010 and 2011, defines brain death as permanent loss of function of the entire brain, including the brainstem: coma, brainstem areflexia and apnea. It is legal death under the Uniform Determination of Death Act.

Greer 2023; Lewis 2023: SBP and MAP are now both required.
Prerequisite2023 standard (adults)
Observation≥24 h after hypoxic-ischemic injury
TemperatureCore ≥36 °C; after ≤35.5 °C, wait 24 h after rewarming
Blood pressureSBP ≥100 and MAP ≥75 (MAP alone on VA-ECMO); pressors allowed
Drugs≥5 half-lives; longer in organ failure, obesity, hypothermia
LevelsPentobarbital <5 mcg/mL; alcohol ≤80 mg/dL
ParalysisTrain-of-four with 4 twitches, or deep tendon reflexes
MetabolicNo severe metabolic, acid-base or endocrine derangement

The examination confirms coma with no response beyond spinal reflexes, no pupillary light response, and absent corneal, oculocephalic (skipped if the neck is unsafe), oculovestibular, gag and cough reflexes. One examination by a credentialed clinician suffices in adults; children need two, by different clinicians at least 12 hours apart. No one involved in organ recovery may take part.

Apnea test: bring PaCO₂ to 35–45 mm Hg and pH to 7.35–7.45 (or a known chronic baseline); preoxygenate with 100% O₂ for at least 10 minutes toward a PaO₂ above 200; stop ventilator breaths and give oxygen by a catheter at the carina at 4–6 L/min (adults), CPAP, or a flow-inflating bag with a PEEP valve. No breathing with arterial PaCO₂ ≥60 and ≥20 above baseline and pH below 7.30 supports brain death. Stop for any breath, SBP <100 or MAP <75 despite titration, a progressive fall in SpO₂ below 85%, or an arrhythmia with hemodynamic instability. On ECMO, preoxygenate through the membrane lung too, then lower sweep gas to 0.2–1 L/min or add CO₂ to the circuit; on VA ECMO, sample the distal arterial line and post-oxygenator blood (Lewis 2023).

Ancillary tests are needed only when the examination or apnea test cannot be completed, or with chronic hypercapnia and an unknown baseline: catheter angiography, radionuclide flow scanning, or transcranial Doppler (adults only); EEG, CTA, MRA, MRI and evoked potentials do not qualify. Time of death is when the final apnea-test gas meets criteria, or when a clinician documents a confirming ancillary test. Consent is not needed unless state law or policy says so, but families are told testing is planned, offered reasonable accommodation, and given limited time before organ support stops.

Organ donation: referral, request and pathways

Hospitals must phone their OPO about every death and imminent death, ideally within 1 hour and before any life-sustaining therapy is withdrawn; batch lists are not allowed (CMS tag A-0886). Each hospital defines imminent death with its OPO, for example a ventilated patient with severe brain injury and a GCS at or below an agreed threshold, a planned brain death evaluation, or an order to withdraw support. Early referral lets the OPO judge suitability before any family is approached.

Only an OPO representative or a hospital designated requester trained by the OPO may ask the family, ideally together, and no family may be skipped because of assumptions about grief, race, religion or income (CMS tags A-0889 and A-0890). In Siminoff 2001, 56.7% of 420 families consented, more often when their pre-request profile, including knowing the patient's wishes, favored donation (adjusted OR 7.68) or they had more contact with OPO staff (OR 3.08). In most states the revised Uniform Anatomical Gift Act (2006) bars others from revoking a registered adult donor's own gift, so the family is informed rather than asked.

Care decisions must stand alone: the 2023 brain death guideline asks clinicians to weigh only their patient's interests. For DCD, the ATS/ISHLT/SCCM/AOPO/UNOS statement (Gries 2013) puts discussion of withdrawal before any mention of donation and gives transplant staff no role in the decision, the withdrawal or the declaration of death. OPTN rules effective November 18, 2026 add a 5-minute minimum between circulatory cessation and organ recovery, a formal pause families or staff can call over safety concerns, documented neurologic assessments, and specific consent for premortem DCD drugs or procedures (HRSA 2026).

Gries 2013; OPTN 2026 (ESOT 2026 also sets 5 minutes). Prepare DCD families for where withdrawal happens and for the chance that death comes too late to donate.
FeatureBrain death (DBD)Controlled DCD
PatientDead by neurologic criteriaNot brain dead; withdrawal already chosen
CirculationHeart beats until recovery in the ORWithdrawal in ICU or OR; death awaited
Declared byCare team's brain death determinationCare team, after ≥2 min without circulation
Before recoveryDonor management after deathPremortem heparin needs surrogate consent
Main riskInstability, DI, arrestNo death in time: comfort care continues

Caring for the brain-dead donor

Meeting the UNOS Region 5 donor management goals (any 7 of 9) before recovery predicted more organs transplanted per donor (Malinoski 2012: 4 or more organs, OR 2.34).

UNOS Region 5 DMG Registry targets (Sally 2019); the original 2008 checklist used glucose ≤150. OPO protocols vary.
GoalTarget
MAP60–110 mm Hg
CVP4–12 mm Hg
Ejection fraction50% or higher
VasopressorsOne, low dose (norepinephrine ≤0.2 mcg/kg/min)
Arterial pH7.30–7.50
PaO₂/FiO₂300 or higher
Sodium155 mEq/L or lower
Glucose180 mg/dL or lower
Urine output0.5 mL/kg/h or more over 4 h

The Canadian guideline (Ball 2020) suggests a MAP of at least 65, vasopressin as the first vasopressor and norepinephrine second, and suggests against dopamine at any dose (conditional, very low to low certainty). Diabetes insipidus shows as large volumes of dilute urine and a rising sodium: replace free water and give desmopressin 1–4 mcg IV, repeated as needed, or vasopressin when hypotension coexists, keeping sodium below 155 (Meyfroidt 2019).

For lung donors, Canada 2020 strongly recommends tidal volumes of 6–8 mL/kg, PEEP of at least 8 and recruitment after ventilator disconnections. In Mascia 2010 (118 donors), a protective strategy made 95% vs 54% of donors eligible to give lungs and doubled lungs harvested (54% vs 27%).

In Dhar 2023 (838 unstable heart donors), levothyroxine 30 mcg/h for at least 12 hours did not add hearts for transplant (54.9% vs 53.2% with saline) and caused more severe hypertension (26 vs 5) and tachycardia (16 vs 3); Canada 2020 suggests against routine thyroid hormone. Methylprednisolone (15 mg/kg or 1 g daily) is still used despite largely neutral trials, given after blood for HLA typing is drawn (Meyfroidt 2019).

Keep the core above 35 °C (Meyfroidt 2019). Mild hypothermia of 34–35 °C cut delayed kidney graft function from 39% to 28% (Niemann 2015), and Canada 2020 suggests it unless the kidneys will not be used, but it did worse than machine perfusion of the kidneys in a later trial (30% vs 19%, Malinoski 2023). Treat glucose above 180; a hemoglobin threshold of 7, platelets above 50,000 and INR below 1.5 before surgery are proposed goals, untested in donors (Meyfroidt 2019).

Exam pearls

Practice free in your browser3,800+ exam-style questions with rationales. No account, no ads. Also free on the App Store and Google Play.

Related one-pagers

Calculators for this topic

Sources

  1. Marshall MF, Davis FD, Fogelman PA, et al. Society of Critical Care Medicine Clinical Practice Guidelines on Adult End-of-Life Care in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2025;53(12):e2734-e2746. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000006856 Link
  2. Kesecioglu J, Rusinova K, Alampi D, et al. European Society of Intensive Care Medicine guidelines on end of life and palliative care in the intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med. 2024;50(11):1740-1766. Link
  3. Truog RD, Campbell ML, Curtis JR, et al. Recommendations for end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: a consensus statement by the American College of Critical Care Medicine. Crit Care Med. 2008;36(3):953-963. Link
  4. Kon AA, Davidson JE, Morrison W, et al. Shared Decision Making in ICUs: An American College of Critical Care Medicine and American Thoracic Society Policy Statement. Crit Care Med. 2016;44(1):188-201. Link
  5. Lautrette A, Darmon M, Megarbane B, et al. A communication strategy and brochure for relatives of patients dying in the ICU. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(5):469-478. Link
  6. White DB, Angus DC, Shields AM, et al. A Randomized Trial of a Family-Support Intervention in Intensive Care Units. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(25):2365-2375. Link
  7. Chang DW, Neville TH, Parrish J, et al. Evaluation of Time-Limited Trials Among Critically Ill Patients With Advanced Medical Illnesses and Reduction of Nonbeneficial ICU Treatments. JAMA Intern Med. 2021;181(6):786-794. Link
  8. Bosslet GT, Pope TM, Rubenfeld GD, et al. An Official ATS/AACN/ACCP/ESICM/SCCM Policy Statement: Responding to Requests for Potentially Inappropriate Treatments in Intensive Care Units. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;191(11):1318-1330. Link
  9. Norton SA, Hogan LA, Holloway RG, et al. Proactive palliative care in the medical intensive care unit: effects on length of stay for selected high-risk patients. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(6):1530-1535. Link
  10. National POLST. POLST and Advance Care Planning (ACP). Link
  11. American Nurses Association. Position Statement: Nurses' Roles and Responsibilities in Providing Care and Support at the End of Life. 2024. Link
  12. Robert R, Le Gouge A, Kentish-Barnes N, et al. Terminal weaning or immediate extubation for withdrawing mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients (the ARREVE observational study). Intensive Care Med. 2017;43(12):1793-1807. Link
  13. Fehnel CR, Armengol de la Hoz M, Celi LA, et al. Incidence and Risk Model Development for Severe Tachypnea Following Terminal Extubation. Chest. 2020;158(4):1456-1463. Link
  14. Chan JD, Treece PD, Engelberg RA, et al. Narcotic and benzodiazepine use after withdrawal of life support: association with time to death? Chest. 2004;126(1):286-293. Link
  15. Greer DM, Kirschen MP, Lewis A, et al. Pediatric and Adult Brain Death/Death by Neurologic Criteria Consensus Guideline: Report of the AAN Guidelines Subcommittee, AAP, CNS, and SCCM. Neurology. 2023;101(24):1112-1132. Link
  16. Lewis A, Kirschen MP, Greer D. The 2023 AAN/AAP/CNS/SCCM Pediatric and Adult Brain Death/Death by Neurologic Criteria Consensus Practice Guideline: A Comparison With the 2010 and 2011 Guidelines. Neurol Clin Pract. 2023;13(6):e200189. Link
  17. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. State Operations Manual, Appendix A: Survey Protocol, Regulations and Interpretive Guidelines for Hospitals; 42 CFR 482.45, tags A-0886 to A-0891 (organ, tissue and eye procurement). Link
  18. Gries CJ, White DB, Truog RD, et al. An official American Thoracic Society/International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation/Society of Critical Care Medicine/Association of Organ and Procurement Organizations/United Network of Organ Sharing Statement: ethical and policy considerations in organ donation after circulatory determination of death. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;188(1):103-109. Link
  19. Health Resources and Services Administration. Upcoming Donation after Circulatory Death Policy Changes (OPTN policy, implementation November 18, 2026). HRSA bulletin, September 18, 2026. Link
  20. Siminoff LA, Gordon N, Hewlett J, Arnold RM. Factors influencing families' consent for donation of solid organs for transplantation. JAMA. 2001;286(1):71-77. Link
  21. Kotloff RM, Blosser S, Fulda GJ, et al. Management of the Potential Organ Donor in the ICU: Society of Critical Care Medicine/American College of Chest Physicians/Association of Organ Procurement Organizations Consensus Statement. Crit Care Med. 2015;43(6):1291-1325. Link
  22. Meyfroidt G, Gunst J, Martin-Loeches I, et al. Management of the brain-dead donor in the ICU: general and specific therapy to improve transplantable organ quality. Intensive Care Med. 2019;45(3):343-353. Link
  23. Ball IM, Hornby L, Rochwerg B, et al. Management of the neurologically deceased organ donor: A Canadian clinical practice guideline. CMAJ. 2020;192(14):E361-E369. Link
  24. Malinoski DJ, Patel MS, Daly MC, et al. The impact of meeting donor management goals on the number of organs transplanted per donor: results from the United Network for Organ Sharing Region 5 prospective donor management goals study. Crit Care Med. 2012;40(10):2773-2780. Link
  25. Dhar R, Marklin GF, Klinkenberg WD, et al. Intravenous Levothyroxine for Unstable Brain-Dead Heart Donors. N Engl J Med. 2023;389(22):2029-2038. Link