One-Pager

Ventilator Liberation and Tracheostomy

SAT and SBT, cuff leak and steroids, HFNC or NIV after extubation, stridor, trach care and NTSP emergencies

Reviewed by Alex G, BSN, RN, CEN, CCRN, CMC, NREMT-P · Checked against current sources October 2026

Download one-page PDFLetter landscape, ready to print or keep with your notes

Daily screen: wake, then breathe

Ranges span ARDSNet and Wake Up and Breathe.
ScreenUsual pass mark
CauseImproving; own breathing efforts; no paralytic
OxygenationFiO₂ ≤0.40–0.50, PEEP ≤5–8, SpO₂ ≥88–90%
CirculationNo or low-dose vasopressor (Subirà 2019); no ischemia
SedationPassed SAT: awake, RASS −1 to +1

Running the SBT

Fail the SBT forThreshold
BreathingRR >35 or <8; SpO₂ <88–90%; Vt <4 mL/kg PBW; pH <7.30
CirculationHR >140 or 20% change; SBP >180 or <90; new arrhythmia
DistressAgitation, drowsiness, sweating, accessory muscles, paradox

Failed: full support, find the cause, retry in 24 h.

Before the tube comes out

Methylprednisolone 40 mg once 4 h before (Cheng 2011) or 20 mg every 4 h from 12 h before (François 2007); dexamethasone 5 mg every 6 h × 4 (Lee 2007).

After extubation

ERS 2022: NIV over HFNC for high risk unless contraindicated.
PatientSupportEvidence
Low riskHFNC over standard O₂Reintubation 4.9% vs 12.2% (Hernández 2016)
High risk: >65, heart failure, COPD, obesityNIV at once, HFNC betweenATS/CHEST strong; 11.8% vs 18.2% (HIGH-WEAN)
Hypercapnic in the SBTNIVFailure 15% vs 48% (Ferrer 2009)

Tracheostomy: timing and daily care

TracMan (Young 2013): day 4 vs 10 or later, 30-day mortality 30.8% vs 31.5%; only 44.9% of the late group ever got one.

Tube partNursing point
Cuff20–30 cm H₂O by manometer each shift (ICS: ≤25)
Inner cannulaRemove to clear a block; clean at least 8-hourly off vent
FenestrationFor speech; caution while ventilated
Subglottic portSuction above the cuff before deflating

Blocked or displaced trach (NTSP)

  1. Call the airway expert; read the bedhead sign (green trach, red laryngectomy).
  2. Look, listen, feel at mouth and stoma; capnography on the tube.
  3. High-flow O₂ to face and stoma; no pulse: CPR.
  4. Remove speaking valve or cap and inner cannula.
  5. Suction catheter passes: suction, ventilate if apneic, reassess.
  6. Won't pass: deflate the cuff; no better: remove the tube.
  7. Oxygenate: bag-mask over mouth with stoma covered, or small mask or LMA on stoma.
  8. Expert: uncut oral tube past the stoma, or 6.0 cuffed tube into it.

Laryngectomy: oxygenate and ventilate via the stoma only. Stoma under 7 days old: no blind reinsertion (false passage).

Practice Ventilator Liberation and Tracheostomy questions free in your browser49 exam-style questions with rationales. No account or download needed.

In depth

The one-page summary above is what the PDF prints. These sections go further.

Why weaning fails: load, capacity, heart and brain

Liberation works when respiratory muscle capacity exceeds the load, the heart tolerates the switch to negative intrathoracic pressure, and the brain drives breathing and protects the airway. Load rises with secretions, bronchospasm, auto-PEEP, stiff lungs and the high minute ventilation of fever, sepsis and acidosis. Capacity falls with sedatives, low phosphate, potassium or magnesium, ICU-acquired weakness and disuse: in organ donors after 18–69 hours of controlled ventilation, diaphragm fibers were 53–57% smaller than in controls (Levine 2008).

An overloaded pump breathes fast and shallow, so dead space takes a larger share of each breath and PaCO₂ rises late. The tube adds little: after a passed 2-hour T-piece trial, work of breathing was the same through the tube as after extubation (1.72 vs 1.63 J/L), the tube accounting for about 11% (Straus 1998).

Negative intrathoracic pressure raises venous return and left ventricular afterload while breathing work and a catecholamine surge raise oxygen demand. A stiff, ischemic or failing ventricle answers with weaning-induced pulmonary edema, behind a third or more of weaning failures (Routsi 2019). Clues during a failing SBT: PAOP ≥18 mm Hg, plasma protein or hemoglobin up over 5%, BNP up over 12%, E/A over 0.95 with E/e′ over 8.5. Treat with diuresis, plus nitrates for hypertension or ischemia; BNP-guided diuresis shortened time to extubation (Mekontso Dessap 2012).

The pathway: daily screen, SAT, SBT and protocols

A daily screen by nurses and therapists followed by a 2-hour SBT cut ventilation from 6 to 4.5 days and complications from 41% to 20% (Ely 1996). The ABC trial (Girard 2008, n = 336) added a spontaneous awakening trial before each SBT: 14.7 vs 11.6 ventilator-free days, ICU stay 9.1 vs 12.9 days, 1-year death hazard ratio 0.68. Self-extubation rose (16 vs 6) but reintubation after it did not (5 vs 3).

Adults ventilated over 24 h (Schmidt 2017); not yet updated.
ATS/CHEST 2017 recommendationStrength, certainty
First SBT with PS 5–8, not T-piece or CPAPConditional, moderate
Protocols that minimize sedationConditional, low
High risk: extubate to preventive NIVStrong, moderate
Protocolized early mobilizationConditional, low
Ventilator liberation protocolConditional, low
Cuff leak test if high risk for stridorConditional, very low
Failed leak: steroid at least 4 h beforeConditional, moderate

Since then, AARC 2024 suggests the RSBI is not needed before an SBT, PS of 8 or less or none, screening and SBT before noon, and no rise in FiO₂ during the trial. KSCCM 2024 accepts PS or T-piece, leaves the RSBI to the clinician, supports inspiratory muscle training and HFNC after extubation, and advises against early tracheostomy to speed weaning.

Thresholds vary: ARDSNet screens at FiO₂ ≤0.40 with PEEP ≤8 (or ≤0.50 with PEEP ≤5), SBP ≥90 without vasopressors and no paralytic; Wake Up and Breathe at SpO₂ ≥88%, FiO₂ ≤0.50, PEEP ≤7.5, no vasopressors or ischemia. A failed SAT (agitation, pain, RR over 35, SpO₂ under 88%, distress, arrhythmia) restarts sedation at half dose, with a new screen in 24 hours.

Running the SBT and reading the numbers

Subirà changed mode and length together (30 min of PS 8 vs 2 h of T-piece).
MethodWhat it changesEvidence
PS 5–8, PEEP 0–5Offsets tube resistance; easiestSubirà 2019: 82.3% vs 74.0% successful extubation
CPAP 5PEEP only; lowers the RSBIPatel 2009: RSBI 71 on CPAP vs 90 on T-piece
T-pieceNo support; closest to life after extubationStraus 1998; hardest on the heart

In high-risk patients, Thille 2022 (n = 969) found PS 8 without PEEP and T-piece equal for ventilator-free days (27 each); more were extubated within 24 h after PS (77.7% vs 72.2%), with similar reintubation (14.9% vs 13.6%). Thirty- and 120-minute trials performed alike (Esteban 1999).

ARDSNet stops the trial for SpO₂ under 90%, RR over 35, Vt under 4 mL/kg PBW, pH under 7.30 or two distress signs (HR over 120% of baseline, accessory muscles, paradox, sweating, marked dyspnea); Wake Up and Breathe for SpO₂ under 88%, RR over 35 or under 8, distress, mental status change or arrhythmia. AARC 2024 asks whether 90% is too strict.

The RSBI, measured during unassisted breathing, was the best predictor in Yang and Tobin 1991 (64-patient test set): under 105 had sensitivity 0.97 and specificity 0.64 (maximal inspiratory pressure specificity 0.11); a 2022 meta-analysis cited by AARC gives 0.83 and 0.58. As a gate before the SBT it prolonged weaning (3 vs 2 days) without fewer failures (Tanios 2006).

After a failed SBT, return to full support and look for the reason: sedation or delirium, fluid overload or ischemia, secretions, bronchospasm or auto-PEEP, low phosphate, potassium or magnesium, metabolic alkalosis, weakness. Hypercapnic COPD patients who fail can be extubated straight to NIV in experienced units (ERS/ATS 2017, conditional).

Airway protection, the cuff leak test and steroids

Passing an SBT does not show that secretions can be cleared or that the upper airway will stay open. Among 88 patients who passed (Salam 2004), cough peak flow ≤60 L/min raised failure about fivefold, secretions over 2.5 mL/h threefold and failing four simple commands fourfold; with all three every extubation failed, with none 3%.

Laryngeal edema follows 5–54% of extubations and stridor 1.5–26.3%, with reintubation for it in 1.1–10.5% (Pluijms 2015). Risk factors (ATS/CHEST 2017): traumatic intubation, intubation over 6 days, a large tube, female sex, reintubation after unplanned extubation.

  1. Volume assist-control; suction the mouth and above the cuff.
  2. Note the delivered Vt, then deflate the cuff fully.
  3. Average the 3 lowest exhaled Vt of 6 breaths; leak = delivered minus that.
  4. Under 110 mL or about 10–25% of Vt fails; reinflate to 20–30 cm H₂O if waiting.

A leak under 110 mL had a positive predictive value of 0.80 and a negative predictive value of 0.98 for stridor (Miller and Cole 1996); across nine studies sensitivity was 0.56 and specificity 0.92 (Ochoa 2009). A good leak reassures; a poor one overcalls, since pooled secretions or a large tube can shrink the leak without edema, so ATS/CHEST treats a failed test with steroids rather than waiting.

Benefit is greatest in patients selected by a failed leak test (Kuriyama 2017); watch glucose.
TrialRegimenResult
François 2007 (n 761, unselected)Methylprednisolone 20 mg IV 12 h before, then q4hEdema 3% vs 22%; reintubation 4% vs 8%
Cheng 2011 (leak under 24% of Vt)Methylprednisolone 40 mg IV once, 4 h beforeStridor 15.8% vs 39.4%; reintubation 7.9% vs 30.3%
Lee 2007 (leak under 110 mL)Dexamethasone 5 mg IV q6h × 4 the day beforeStridor 10% vs 27.5%
Kuriyama 2017 (11 RCTs, 2,472)Prophylactic steroidsStridor RR 0.43; reintubation RR 0.42

Support after extubation, and when NIV harms

In the high-risk HFNC trial, post-extubation respiratory failure was 26.9% with HFNC vs 39.8% with NIV.
TrialPatientsResult
Hernández 2016 (n 527)Low risk: HFNC vs oxygenReintubation 4.9% vs 12.2%
Hernández 2016 (n 604)High risk: HFNC vs NIVReintubation 22.8% vs 19.1%, noninferior
HIGH-WEAN 2019 (n 641)Over 65, or heart or lung diseaseNIV plus HFNC vs HFNC: 11.8% vs 18.2%
Ferrer 2009 (n 106)Hypercapnic chronic lung diseaseNIV vs oxygen: failure 15% vs 48%
Hernández 2022 (n 182)4 or more risk factorsNIV vs HFNC: reintubation 23.3% vs 38.8%
EXTUB-OBESE 2023 (n 981)ObesityNIV: treatment failure 13.5% vs 26.5%
Esteban 2004 (n 221)Established failure: NIV vs usual careReintubation 48% both; ICU death 25% vs 14%

Low risk in Hernández 2016 meant age under 65, APACHE II under 12, BMI under 30, simple weaning, good secretion control, at most one comorbidity, and no heart failure, moderate to severe COPD, airway problem or prolonged ventilation. ATS/CHEST 2017 strongly recommends immediate preventive NIV at high risk; ERS/ATS 2017 makes it conditional; ERS 2022 prefers NIV over HFNC at high risk and HFNC over oxygen at low risk. HIGH-WEAN gave NIV at least 12 hours a day for 48 hours.

Rescue is different: in Esteban 2004, NIV for failure within 48 hours of extubation delayed reintubation (median 12 h vs 2.5 h) and raised ICU deaths, and ERS/ATS 2017 advises against it. NIV also needs an awake patient who protects the airway; obtundation, copious secretions, vomiting, upper airway obstruction or shock call for reintubation.

Extubation failure, stridor and swallowing

Extubation failure is reintubation within 48–72 hours; NIV and HFNC trials often count 7 days because support can postpone it. It affects about 10–20%, and mortality is higher: 43% vs 12% in hospital (Epstein 1997) and 32.6% vs 6.6% in the ICU (Dadam 2024). In 74 reintubated patients (Epstein 1998), mortality was 53% for non-airway vs 17% for airway causes, and 51% vs 24% when reintubation came after vs within 12 hours.

Timing hints at the cause: laryngeal edema, aspiration and retained secretions usually show within hours; fatigue, weaning-induced pulmonary edema, pneumonia and encephalopathy build over a day or two.

Post-extubation dysphagia is common and often silent: 12.4% overall and 18.3% of emergency admissions in DYnAMICS, persisting to ICU discharge in over 80%, with 9.2% excess 90-day mortality (Zuercher 2019). Screen before oral intake, ideally by trained ICU nurses within hours of extubation, and refer abnormal results to speech-language pathology.

Prolonged weaning and tracheostomy timing

The 2007 consensus calls weaning simple (extubated after the first SBT), difficult (up to 3 SBTs or 7 days) or prolonged (beyond that). WIND (Béduneau 2017), counting from the first separation attempt, found 57% finished within 24 hours, 10% took 1–7 days and 9% longer, while 24% never had an attempt; mortality rose from 6% to 17% to 29% across the three weaning groups.

A tracheostomy is better tolerated than a translaryngeal tube, so sedation can lighten; it allows mouth care, speech and eating and spares the larynx. Its risks are bleeding, stomal infection, displacement, stenosis and, rarely, tracheo-innominate fistula.

KSCCM 2024 advises against early tracheostomy to speed weaning; no guideline sets a day.
StudyComparisonResult
TracMan 2013 (n 909)Day 4 or earlier vs day 10 or later30-day mortality 30.8% vs 31.5%
TracMan late groupTracheostomy only if still needed44.9% ever received one
SETPOINT2 2022 (n 382, stroke)Median day 4 vs day 11mRS 0–4 at 6 months 43.5% vs 47.1%
Cochrane 2015 (7 RCTs, 1,903)Early vs lateMortality RR 0.83, called only suggestive

The stoma forms in about 4 days after open surgery and 7–10 days after a percutaneous procedure (ICS 2014), so a tube that falls out early cannot simply be pushed back. Trach collar sessions beat stepwise pressure support weaning (15 vs 19 days, Jubran 2013), and cuff deflation off the ventilator sped weaning and cut respiratory infections (20% vs 36%, Hernández 2013). SKR/SRLF 2026 adopts both and, unlike KSCCM 2024, advises against threshold inspiratory muscle training.

Tracheostomy tubes, daily care, speaking valves and decannulation

ICS 2014; one labeled size can differ in outer diameter and length by maker.
FeaturePurposeCaution
Cuffed, high-volume low-pressureSeals for ventilationDoes not fully prevent aspiration
Inner cannula (dual cannula)Remove to clear a blocked tubeNarrows the lumen; must lock in place
FenestratedLets air reach the larynx for speechCaution while ventilated; granulation
Adjustable flange or extra lengthObesity, deep or swollen neckRecord the set length
Subglottic suction portDrains secretions above the cuffSuction it before deflating the cuff

Suction only for secretions (AARC 2022): preoxygenate, catheter under half the lumen, 15 seconds or less, shallow to a premeasured depth, no routine saline; adult pressure under 200 mm Hg (many units use 80–120). A catheter that will not pass means a blocked inner cannula or a displaced tube (ICS 2014).

A one-way speaking valve opens on inspiration and closes on expiration, sending exhaled gas through the cords. It needs the cuff fully deflated or a cuffless tube, room for air around the tube (outer diameter at most about three-quarters of the trachea), an awake patient who manages secretions, and exhalation possible with the hub briefly occluded. With the cuff up the patient cannot exhale: asphyxia, barotrauma, falling cardiac output (ICS 2014).

Early cuff deflation with an in-line valve restored voice a median 11 days sooner (Freeman-Sanderson 2016, n = 30), and routine valve use cut time to speech from 18 to 9 days without longer ventilation (Sutt 2015). Dysphagia affects up to 93% of tracheostomized patients and causes 64% of decannulation failures, so SKR/SRLF 2026 advises early swallowing work by ICU staff rather than waiting for a specialist.

Deciding decannulation by suctioning frequency on continuous high flow, instead of a 24-hour capping trial, cut time to decannulation from 13 to 6 days without more failures (Hernández 2020, n = 330). SKR/SRLF 2026 adopts it: no more than 2 suctions per 8 hours over 24 hours, a 5-minute occlusion test with the cuff down, and no severe dysphagia.

Tracheostomy and laryngectomy emergencies

Obstruction and displacement are the commonest tracheostomy problems (ICS 2014). Partial displacement into pretracheal tissue is the more dangerous because it is subtle: the suction catheter will not pass, capnography fades, pressures rise or volumes fall, surgical emphysema appears, or the patient vocalizes with the cuff up. Capnography is mandatory for ventilator-dependent patients, and without experienced help, removing a partly displaced tube may be safer than pushing it back (ICS 2014).

NTSP (McGrath 2012) starts from the bedhead sign. Green is a tracheostomy with a potentially patent upper airway: oxygen to face and stoma, and the mouth stays a route. A cuffed tube in the trachea blocks bag-mask ventilation from above until the cuff is deflated or the tube removed (ICS 2014). Then cover the stoma and bag by mouth, or put a pediatric mask or supraglottic airway on the stoma; an expert intubates orally with an uncut tube past the stoma or places a small tracheostomy or 6.0 cuffed tube in the stoma.

Red is a laryngectomy: the trachea ends at the neck and the mouth no longer reaches the lungs. Oxygen, rescue ventilation and intubation all go through the stoma; when unsure, give oxygen to face and stoma. NTSP advises against blind reinsertion before day 7, especially after a percutaneous tracheostomy: a false passage makes ventilation impossible.

Early bleeding usually comes from the stoma edges and settles with pressure and correction of coagulopathy. Tracheo-innominate fistula complicates about 0.1–1% of tracheostomies, peaks around days 7–14 (Grant 2006) and often follows a small sentinel bleed: hyperinflate the cuff and leave it up, press a finger through the stoma against the back of the manubrium, secure the airway below the bleed and call surgery.

Exam pearls

Practice free in your browser3,800+ exam-style questions with rationales. No account, no ads. Also free on the App Store and Google Play.

Related one-pagers

Calculators for this topic

Sources

  1. Schmidt GA, Girard TD, Kress JP, et al. Official Executive Summary of an American Thoracic Society/American College of Chest Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline: Liberation from Mechanical Ventilation in Critically Ill Adults. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;195(1):115-119. Link
  2. Roberts KJ, Goodfellow LT, Battey-Muse CM, et al. AARC Clinical Practice Guideline: Spontaneous Breathing Trials for Liberation From Adult Mechanical Ventilation. Respir Care. 2024;69(7):891-901. Link
  3. Ha TS, Oh DK, Lee HJ, et al. Liberation from mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients: Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine Clinical Practice Guidelines. Acute Crit Care. 2024;39(1):1-23. doi:10.4266/acc.2024.00052 Link
  4. Medrinal C, Delemazure J, Billard M, et al. Expert consensus-based clinical practice guidelines for care and weaning procedures in tracheostomized ICU patients after invasive mechanical ventilation: a joint statement by the Intensive Care Physiotherapy Society (SKR) and the French Intensive Care Society (SRLF). Ann Intensive Care. 2026;16:100045. doi:10.1016/j.aicoj.2026.100045 Link
  5. Rochwerg B, Brochard L, Elliott MW, et al. Official ERS/ATS clinical practice guidelines: noninvasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure. Eur Respir J. 2017;50(2):1602426. Link
  6. Oczkowski S, Ergan B, Bos L, et al. ERS clinical practice guidelines: high-flow nasal cannula in acute respiratory failure. Eur Respir J. 2022;59(4):2101574. doi:10.1183/13993003.01574-2021 Link
  7. NIH NHLBI ARDS Clinical Network (ARDSNet). Mechanical Ventilation Protocol Summary, Part II: Weaning. 2008. Link
  8. Girard TD, Kress JP, Fuchs BD, et al. Efficacy and safety of a paired sedation and ventilator weaning protocol for mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care (Awakening and Breathing Controlled trial). Lancet. 2008;371(9607):126-134. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60105-1 Link
  9. Subirà C, Hernández G, Vázquez A, et al. Effect of Pressure Support vs T-Piece Ventilation Strategies During Spontaneous Breathing Trials on Successful Extubation Among Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019;321(22):2175-2182. Link
  10. Thille AW, Gacouin A, Coudroy R, et al. Spontaneous-Breathing Trials with Pressure-Support Ventilation or a T-Piece. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(20):1843-1854. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2209041 Link
  11. Yang KL, Tobin MJ. A prospective study of indexes predicting the outcome of trials of weaning from mechanical ventilation. N Engl J Med. 1991;324(21):1445-1450. doi:10.1056/NEJM199105233242101 Link
  12. Miller RL, Cole RP. Association between reduced cuff leak volume and postextubation stridor. Chest. 1996;110(4):1035-1040. doi:10.1378/chest.110.4.1035 Link
  13. François B, Bellissant E, Gissot V, et al. 12-h pretreatment with methylprednisolone versus placebo for prevention of postextubation laryngeal oedema: a randomised double-blind trial. Lancet. 2007;369(9567):1083-1089. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60526-1 Link
  14. Pluijms WA, van Mook WN, Wittekamp BH, Bergmans DC. Postextubation laryngeal edema and stridor resulting in respiratory failure in critically ill adult patients: updated review. Crit Care. 2015;19:295. Link
  15. Hernández G, Vaquero C, González P, et al. Effect of Postextubation High-Flow Nasal Cannula vs Conventional Oxygen Therapy on Reintubation in Low-Risk Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016;315(13):1354-1361. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.2711 Link
  16. Thille AW, Muller G, Gacouin A, et al. Effect of Postextubation High-Flow Nasal Oxygen With Noninvasive Ventilation vs High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Alone on Reintubation Among Patients at High Risk of Extubation Failure (HIGH-WEAN): A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019;322(15):1465-1475. Link
  17. Esteban A, Frutos-Vivar F, Ferguson ND, et al. Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation for respiratory failure after extubation. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(24):2452-2460. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa032736 Link
  18. Epstein SK, Ciubotaru RL, Wong JB. Effect of failed extubation on the outcome of mechanical ventilation. Chest. 1997;112(1):186-192. doi:10.1378/chest.112.1.186 Link
  19. Young D, Harrison DA, Cuthbertson BH, Rowan K; TracMan Collaborators. Effect of early vs late tracheostomy placement on survival in patients receiving mechanical ventilation: the TracMan randomized trial. JAMA. 2013;309(20):2121-2129. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.5154 Link
  20. McGrath BA, Bates L, Atkinson D, Moore JA; National Tracheostomy Safety Project. Multidisciplinary guidelines for the management of tracheostomy and laryngectomy airway emergencies. Anaesthesia. 2012;67(9):1025-1041. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07217.x Link
  21. Grant CA, Dempsey G, Harrison J, Jones T. Tracheo-innominate artery fistula after percutaneous tracheostomy: three case reports and a clinical review. Br J Anaesth. 2006;96(1):127-131. doi:10.1093/bja/aei282 Link
  22. Intensive Care Society (UK). Standards for the care of adult patients with a temporary tracheostomy: standards and guidelines. 2014. Link
  23. Blakeman TC, Scott JB, Yoder MA, Capellari E, Strickland SL. AARC Clinical Practice Guidelines: Artificial Airway Suctioning. Respir Care. 2022;67(2):258-271. doi:10.4187/respcare.09548 Link
  24. Hernández Martínez G, Rodriguez ML, Vaquero MC, et al. High-Flow Oxygen with Capping or Suctioning for Tracheostomy Decannulation. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(11):1009-1017. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2010834 Link
  25. Zuercher P, Moret CS, Dziewas R, Schefold JC. Dysphagia in the intensive care unit: epidemiology, mechanisms, and clinical management. Crit Care. 2019;23:103. Link
  26. Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEMLearning). Tracheostomy emergencies in adults (reference summary of the NTSP algorithms). Link